Referencias bibliográficas



Alexy, O., Criscoulo, P., & Salter, A. (2009). Does IP Strategy Have to Cripple Open Innovation ? Does IP Strategy Have to Cripple Open Innovation ? Management Intellectual Property, 51(1), 70–77.

Aloini, D., Lazzarotti, V., Manzini, R., & Pellegrini, L. (2017). IP, openness, and innovation performance: an empirical study. Management Decision, 55(6), 1307–1327. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-04-2016-0230

Arora, A., Athreye, S., & Huang, C. (2016). The paradox of openness revisited: Collaborative innovation and patenting by UK innovators. Research Policy, 45(7), 1352–1361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.03.019

Arora, A., & Gambardella, A. (2010). Ideas for rent: An overview of markets for technology. Industrial and Corporate Change, 19(3), 775–803. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtq022

Arundel, A. (2001). The relative effectiveness of patents and secrecy for appropriation. Research Policy, 30(4), 611–624. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00100-1

Baldwin, C. Y., & Henkel, J. (2015). Modularity and intellectual property protection. Strategic Management Journal Strat. Mgmt. J, 36, 1637–1655. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2303

Barros, H. M. (2021). Neither at the cutting edge nor in a patent-friendly environment: Appropriating the returns from innovation in a less developed economy. Research Policy, 50(1), 104097. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2020.104097

Belderbos, R., Carree, M., & Lokshin, B. (2004). Cooperative R&D and firm performance. Research Policy, 33(10), 1477–1492. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RESPOL.2004.07.003

Blind, K., Edler, J., Frietsch, R., & Schmoch, U. (2006). Motives to patent: Empirical evidence from Germany. Research Policy, 35(5), 655–672. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RESPOL.2006.03.002

Bogers, M. (2011). The open innovation paradox: Knowledge sharing and protection in R&D collaborations. European Journal of Innovation Management, 14(1), 93–117. https://doi.org/10.1108/14601061111104715

Campi, M., Antonio, M., & Esterling, D. (2018). ¿El fortalecimiento de los derechos de propiedad intelectual estimula la innovación? Un análisis exploratorio de la dinámica de patentamiento por sectores industriales en Colombia, 1980- 2010. Cuadernos de Administracion, 33. doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.cao33.fdpi

Capponi, G., Criscuolo, P., Martinelli, A., & Nuvolari, A. (2019). Profiting from innovation: Evidence from a survey of Queen’s Awards winners. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 49, 155–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2019.02.002

Castillo-Vergara, M., & Torres Aranibar, E. (2019). El papel de la Cooperación para Desarrollar Innovación Tecnológica en la PYME. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 14(4), 41–53. https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-27242019000400041

Chen, H., Zeng, S., Yu, B., & Xue, H. (2020). Complementarity in Open Innovation and Corporate Strategy: The Moderating Effect of Ownership and Location Strategies. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 67(3), 754–768. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2018.2889804

Chesbrough, H. W. (2003). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Harvard Business Press

Chesbrough, H., Lettl, C., & Ritter, T. (2018). Value Creation and Value Capture in Open Innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 35(6), 930–938. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12471

Cohen, W. M., Goto, A., Nagata, A., Nelson, R. R., & Walsh, J. P. (2002). RandD spillovers, patents, and the incentives to innovate in Japan and the United States. Research Policy, 31(8–9), 1349–1367. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00068-9

Colombelli, A., Grilli, L., Minola, T., & Mrkajic, B. (2020). To what extent do young innovative companies take advantage of policy support to enact innovation appropriation mechanisms? Research Policy, 49(10), 103797. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.05.006

Corral de Zubielqui, G., Jones, J., & Audretsch, D. (2019). The influence of trust and collaboration with external partners on appropriability in open service firms. Journal of Technology Transfer, 44(2), 540–558. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-018-9696-y

DANE. (2019). Boletín Técnico EDIT 2017 - 2018. 1–60. https://www.dane.gov.co/files/investigaciones/boletines/edit/boletin_EDIT_manufacturera_2017_2018.pdf

De Beer, J., & Armstrong, C. (2015). Open innovation and knowledge appropriation in African micro y small enterprises ( MSEs ). The African Journal of Information and Communication, 16, 60–71. 10.23962/10539/19315

De León, I., Fernandez, J. (2015). El costo de uso de los sistemas de propiedad intelectual para pequeñas empresas innovadoras. El caso de Chile, Colombia y México. Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo. Documento de discusión No IDB-DP-373.

Foege, J. N., Lauritzen, G. D., Tietze, F., & Salge, T. O. (2019). Reconceptualizing the paradox of openness: How solvers navigate sharing-protecting tensions in crowdsourcing. Research Policy, 48(6), 1323–1339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.01.013

Foege, J. N., Piening, E. P., & Salge, T. O. (2017). Don’t get caught on the wrong foot: A resource- based perspective on imitation threats in innovation partnerships. International Journal of Innovation Management, 21(3). https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919617500232

Freel, M., & Robson, P. J. (2017). Appropriation strategies and open innovation in SMEs. International Small Business Journal: Researching Entrepreneurship, 35(5), 578–596. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242616654957

González-Álvarez, N., & Nieto-Antolín, M. (2007). Appropriability of innovation results: An empirical study in Spanish manufacturing firms. Technovation, 27(5), 280–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2006.12.004

Hagedoorn, J., & Zobel, A. K. (2015). The role of contracts and intellectual property rights in open innovation. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 27(9), 1050–1067. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2015.1056134

Hall, B., Helmers, C., Rogers, M., & Sena, V. (2014). The choice between formal and informal intellectual property: A review. Journal of Economic Literature, 52(2), 375–423. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.52.2.375

Henttonen, K., Hurmelinna-Laukkanen, P., & Ritala, P. (2016). Managing the appropriability of R&D collaboration. R & D Management, 46, 145–158. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12121

Hertzfeld, H. R., Link, A. N., & Vonortas, N. S. (2006). Intellectual property protection mechanisms in research partnerships. Research Policy, 35(6), 825–838. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.04.006

Holgersson, M., Granstrand, O., & Bogers, M. (2018). The evolution of intellectual property strategy in innovation ecosystems: Uncovering complementary and substitute appropriability regimes. Long Range Planning, 51(2), 303–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2017.08.007

Hurmelinna-laukkanen, P. (2009). The availability, strength, and efficiency of appropriability mechanisms – protecting investments in knowledge creation. International Journal Technology Management, 45 (3-4), 282–290. 10.1504/IJTM.2009.022653

Hurmelinna-Laukkanen, P., & Puumalainen, K. (2007). Nature and dynamics of appropriability: Strategies for appropriating returns on innovation. R and D Management, 37(2), 95–112. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2007.00460.x

James, S. D., Leiblein, M. J., & Lu, S. (2013). How Firms Capture Value From Their Innovations. In Journal of Management (Vol. 39, Issue 5). https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206313488211

Jugend, D., Jabbour, C. J. C., Alves Scaliza, J. A., Rocha, R. S., Junior, J. A. G., Latan, H., & Salgado, M. H. (2018). Relationships among open innovation, innovative performance, government support and firm size: Comparing Brazilian firms embracing different levels of radicalism in innovation. Technovation, 74–75(February), 54–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2018.02.004

Laursen, K., & Salter, A. (2006). Open for innovation: The role of openness in explaining innovation performance among U.K. manufacturing firms. Strategic Management Journal, 27(2), 131–150. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.507

Laursen, K., & Salter, A. J. (2014). The paradox of openness: Appropriability, external search, and collaboration. Research Policy, 43(5), 867–878. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.10.004

Löfsten, H., & Lindelöf, P. (2005). Environmental hostility, strategic orientation and the importance of management accounting - An empirical analysis of new technology-based firms. Technovation, 25(7), 725–738. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2004.01.007

Lorenz, A., & Veer, T. (2019). Once bitten, less shy? The influence of prior misappropriation experience on R&D collaboration. Industry and Innovation, 26(1), 31–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2017.1403891

Milesi, D., Petelski, N., & Verre, V. (2013). Innovation and appropriation mechanisms: Evidence from Argentine microdata. Technovation, 33(2–3), 78–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2012.12.001

Miozzo, M., Desyllas, P., Lee, H. F., & Miles, I. (2016). Innovation collaboration and appropriability by knowledge-intensive business services firms. Research Policy, 45(7), 1337–1351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.03.018

Neuhäusler, P. (2012). The use of patents and informal appropriation mechanisms - Differences between sectors and among companies. Technovation, 32(12), 681–693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2012.07.004

Olander, H., Vanhala, M., & Hurmelinna-Laukkanen, P. (2014). Reasons for choosing mechanisms to protect knowledge and innovations. Management Decision, 52(2), 207–229. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-11-2012-0791

Ordover, J. A. (1991). A patent system for both diffusion and exclusion. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5(1), 43–60.

Pollok, P., Lüttgens, D., & Piller, F. T. (2019). Attracting solutions in crowdsourcing contests: The role of knowledge distance, identity disclosure, and seeker status. Research Policy, 48(1), 98–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RESPOL.2018.07.022

Ray, S., & Ray, P. K. (2021). Innovation strategy of latecomer firms under tight appropriability regimes: The Indian pharmaceuticals industry. Journal of International Management, 27(1), 100820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2020.100820

Salazar-Elena, J. C., López, A., Guimón De Ros, J., & Cancino, C. A. (2020). Sincerity is a dangerous thing: On how appropriability regimes shape innovation strategies. Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems, 38(5), 5521–5528. https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-179643

Stefan, I., & Bengtsson, L. (2016). Appropriability: A key to opening innovation internationally? International Journal of Technology Management, 71(3–4), 232–252. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2016.078570

Teece, D. J. (1986). Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Research Policy, 15(February), 285–305. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789812833181_0005

Yacoub, G., Storey, C., & Haefliger, S. (2020). Appropriability mechanisms for manufacturing and service firms: the contingencies of openness and knowledge intensity. R & D Management, 50(5), 551–572. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12411

Yu, M. J., Chuang, H. J., Hsu, M. Y., & Lin, P. F. (2020). Firm heterogeneity, appropriability, and innovation collaboration. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 32(10), 1156–1168. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2020.1747609

Zhang, J., & Groen, A. (2021). Informal and formal open activities: Innovation protection methods as antecedents and innovation outputs as consequences. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 167(August 2019), 120696. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120696

Zobel, A. K., Lokshin, B., & Hagedoorn, J. (2017). Formal and informal appropriation mechanisms: The role of openness and innovativeness. Technovation, 59(October 2014), 44–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2016.10.001