References
 

Abdulkadiroglu, A., Y.K.Che, P. Pathak,   A.E. Roth,  O. Tercieux (2019) ``Efficiency, Justified Envy, and Incentives in Priority-Based  Matching''. Forthcoming American Economic Review: Insights.

Abdulkadiroglu, A., P. Pathak, and A.E. Roth (2009) ``Strategy-proofness versus Efficiency in Matching with Indifferences: Redesigning the NYC High School Match''.  American Economic Review  99-5, 1954-1978.

Abdulkadiroglu, A., P. Pathak, A.E. Roth,  T. Sönmez (2005) ``The Boston Public School Match''. American Economic Review 95-2, 368-371.

Abdulkadiroglu, A.,  T. Sönmez (2003) ``School Choice: A Mechanism Design Approach''.  American Economic Review 93-3, 729-747.

Alcalde, J.,  A. Romero-Medina (2017) ``Fair Student Placement''.  Theory and Decision 83, 293-307.

Alva, S.,  V. Manjunath (2019) ``Strategy-Proof Pareto Improvements''. Journal of Economic Theory 181, 121-142.

Arnosti, N., (2016) ``Centralized Clearinghouse Design: A Quantity-Quality Tradeoff''. Working Paper, Columbia Business School. Available at  SSRN: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2571527.

Ashlagi, I.,  A.Nikzad,  A.  Romm (2019) ``Assigning More Students to Their Top Choices: A Comparison of Tie-Breaking Rules''. Games and Economic Behavior 115, 767-187.

Balinski, M., T. Sönmez (1999), ``A Tale of Two Mechanisms: Student Placement''. Journal of Economic Theory 84, 73-94.

Blum, Y., A.E. Roth,  U.Rothblum (1997) ``Vacancy Chains and Equilibration in Senior-Level Labor Markets''. Journal of Economic Theory 76, 362-411.

Casalmiglia, C., M. Güell, and C. Fu (2020), ``Structural Estimation of a Model of School Choices: the Boston Mechanism vs. Its Alternatives''. Journal of Political Economy 128 (2), 642-680. 

Dur, U.M., A. Gitmez,  Ö. Yilmaz (2019) ``School Choice under Partial Fairness''. Theoretical Economics 14-4, 1309-1346.

Dur, U.M., S.D. Kominers, P. Pathak, T.  Sönmez (2018) ``Reserve Design: Unintended Consequences and The Demise of Boston?s Walk Zones?. Journal of Political Economy,  126-6, 2457-2479. 

Dur, U.M., T. Morrill (2017) ``The Impossibility of Restricting Tradeable Priorities in School Assignment''. Working Paper, North Carolina State University.

Ehlers, L., T.\ Morrill (2019) ``(Il)legal Assignments in School Choice''. Forthcoming  Review of Economic Studies}.

Erdil, A., and H. Ergin (2008) ``What's the Matter with Tie-Breaking? Improving Efficiency in School Choice''. American Economic Review 98-3, 669-689. 

Gale, D., L. Shapley (1962) ``College Admissions and the Stability of Marriage''. American Mathematical Monthly 69, 9-15.

Górtazar, L., D.  Mayor,    J.Montalbán (2020) ``School Choice Priorities and School Segregation: Evidence from Madrid''.Working Paper, Stockholm University - Swedish Institute for Social Research.

Hakimov, R., O. Kesten (2018) ``The Equitable Top Trading Cycles Mechanism forSchool Choice''. International Economic Review 59-4, 2219-2258.

Kesten, O.(2010) ``School Choice with Consent''. Quarterly Journal of Economics 125, 1297-1348.

Kesten, O., M. Kurino (2019) ``Strategy-proof Improvements upon Deferred Acceptance: A Maximal Domain for Possibility''.  Games and Economic Behavior 117, 120-143.

Morrill, T.\ (2016) ``Petty Envy When Assigning Objects''. Working Paper, North Carolina State University.

Pathak, P. (2016) ``What Really Matters in Designing School Choice Mechanisms''. Advances in Economics and Econometrics, 11th World Congress of the Econometric Society. 

Pathak, P.,  T. Sönmez, M.U.  Unver,   M.B.  Yenmez (2020) ``Leaving No Ethical Value Behind: Triage Protocol Design for Pandemic Rationing'' NBER Working Paper No. 26951.

Ruijs, N.,   H. Oosterbeek (2019) ``School Choice in Amsterdam: Which Schools are Chosen When School Choice is Free? Education Finance and Policy 14-1, 1-30. https://doi.org/10.1162/edfp_a_00237.

Shapley, L.,   H. Scarf (1974) ``On Cores and Indivisibility''.  Journal of Mathematical Economics 1, 23--37. 

Tang, Q.,   J.Yu, (2014) ``A new perspective on Kesten's school choice with consent idea''. Journal of Economic Theory 154, 543-561.