Bibliographical references


Agassi, Joseph. (1975) “Institutional individualism”, The British journal of sociology, 26(2), pp. 144-155. https:// doi.org/10.2307/58958

Bee, Michele and Desmarais-Tremblay, Maxime. (2023) “The Birth of Homo Œconomicus: The methodological debate on the economic agent from JS Mill to V. Pareto”, Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 45(1), pp. 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1053837221000535

Blaug, Mark. (2002) “Ugly currents in modern economics”, in Uskali Mäki (ed.) Facts and Fictions in Economics. 

Models Realism and Social Construction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 35-56.

Boulding, Kenneth E. (1971) “After Samuelson, Who Needs Adam Smith?”, History of Political Economy, 3(2), pp. 225-237. https://doi.org/10.1215/00182702-3-2-225

Carabelli, Ann M. and Cedrini, Mario A. (2014) “Chapter 18 of The General Theory ‘further analysed’: economics as a way of thinking”, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 38(1), pp. 23-47. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/bet017
— (2015) “From Theory to Policy? Keynes’s Distinction Between Apparatus of Thought and Apparatus of Action, with an Eye to the European Debt Crisis,” Challenge, 58(6), pp. 509-531. https://doi.org/10.1080/057751
32.2015.1105666

Chick. Victoria and Dow, Sheila C. (2001) “Formalism, logic and reality: a Keynesian analysis”, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 25(6), pp. 705-722. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/25.6.705
— (2005), “The meaning of open systems”, Journal of Economic Methodology, 12(3), pp. 363-381. https://doi. org/10.1080/13501780500223585

Claeys, Gregory. (1987) “Justice, independence, and industrial democracy: The development of John Stuart Mill’s views on socialism”, The Journal of Politics, 49(1), pp. 122-147. https://doi.org/10.2307/2131137

Coats, Alfred W. (1954) “The Historist Reaction in English Political Economy 1870-90”, Economica, 21(82), pp. 143-153. https://doi.org/10.2307/2551664

Cohen Kaminitz, Shiri. (2014) “JS Mill and the Value of Utility”, History of Political Economy, 46(2), pp. 231-246. https://doi.org/10.1215/00182702-2647486

Colander, David. (2011) “Applied policy, welfare economics, and Mill’s half-truths”, in John B. Davis and D. Wade Hands (eds.) The Elgar Companion to Recent Economic Methodology. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 173-187.

De Mattos, L. V. (2005) “Mill’s transformational view of human nature”. History of Economic Ideas, 13(3), 10001023. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/23722900
— (2019) “The historicist challenge to political economy: an analysis of the methodological debate in England in the 1870’s”, Economia e Sociedade, 28, pp. 641-663. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-3533.2019v28n3art02
— (2020) “John Stuart Mill and the Irish Land Question: An illustration of his view on social institutions”, Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 42(1), pp. 43-60. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1053837219000099

De Marchi, Neil B. (1974 [1991) “The Success of JS Mill’s Principles”, in John Cunningham Wood (ed.) John Stuart Mill: Critical Assessments, vol. II. London: Routledge, pp. 122-154.
— (1988) “John Stuart Mill Interpretation since Schumpeter”, in William O. Thweatt (ed.) Classical political economy: A survey of recent literature. New York: Springer, pp. 137-177.
— (2002) “Putting evidence in its place: John Mill’s early struggles with ‘facts in the concrete’”, in Uskali Mäki (ed.) Fact and Fiction in Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 304-326.

Gioia, Vitantonio. (2020) “From ‘prudent man’ to homo oeconomicus: Does historicity matter for the category of individualism?”, International Review of Economics, 67(1), pp. 47-67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12232019-00331-y

Granovetter, Mark. (1985) “Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness”, American Journal of sociology, 91(3), pp. 481-510. https://doi.org/10.1086/228311

Hausman, Daniel. (1992). The inexact and Separate Science of Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hirsch, Abraham. (2000) “Reply to Hollander and Peart’s ‘John Stuart Mill’s Method’”, Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 22(3), pp. 349-360. https://doi.org/10.1080/10427710050122558

Hollander, Samuel. (1985) The Economics of John Stuart Mill. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
— (1986 [2000]) “The relevance of John Stuart Mill: some implications for modern economics”, in Samuel Hollander (ed.) John Stuart Mill on economic theory and method: Collected essays III. London: Routledge, pp. 185-212.
— (2019) A history of utilitarian ethics: Studies in private motivation and distributive justice, 1700-1875. London: Routledge.

Hollander, Samuel and Peart, Sandra. (1999) “John Stuart Mill’s method in principle and practice: A review of the evidence”. Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 21(4), pp. 369-397. https://doi.org/10.1017/
S1053837200004521

Hodgson, Geoffrey M. (2001) How Economics Forgot History: The Problem of Historical Specificity in Economics. London: Routledge.
— (2005) “Alfred Marshall versus the historical school?”, Journal of Economic Studies, 32(4), pp. 331-348. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443580510618563
— (2007) “Meanings of methodological individualism”, Journal of Economic Methodology, 14(2), pp. 211-226. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501780701394094
— (2013) “Come back Marshall, all is forgiven? Complexity, evolution, mathematics and Marshallian exceptionalism”, The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 20(6), pp. 957-981. https:// doi.org/10.1080/09672567.2013.815245

Hutchinson, Terence. (1998) “Ultra-Deductivism from Nassau Senior to Lionel Robbins and Daniel Hausman”, Journal of Economic Methodology, 5(1), pp. 43-91. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501789800000003

Kawana, Yuichiro. (2018) Logic and Society: The Political Thought of John Stuart Mill, 1827-1848. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Kern, William S. (2001) “Classical economic man: was he interested in keeping up with the Joneses?”, Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 23(3), pp. 353-368. https://doi.org/10.1080/10427710120073636

Keynes, John M. (1924) “Alfred Marshall, 1842-1924”, Economic Journal, 34(135), pp. 311-372. https://doi. org/10.2307/2222645
— (1936 [1973]) “The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money”, in Elizabeth Johnson and Donald Moggridge (eds.) The Collected Writings of John Maynard Keynes, Vol. VII. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kurer, Oskar. (1999) “John Stuart Mill: liberal or utilitarian?”, Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 6(2), pp. 200-215. https://doi.org/10.1080/10427719900000026

Lawson, Tony. (1994) “Why are so many economists so opposed to methodology?”, Journal of Economic Methodology, 1(1), pp. 105-134. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501789400000008
— (2013) “What is this ‘school’ called neoclassical economics?”, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 37(5), pp. 947-983. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/bet027

Maas, Harro. (2005) “Jevons, Mill and the private laboratory of the mind”, The Manchester School, 73(5), pp. 620-649. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9957.2005.00468.

Manioudis, Manolis. (2021) “JS Mill and the Irish land question: From Irish economic history to coherent socialism and Irish historicism”, Irish Economic and Social History, 48(1), pp. 27-46. https://doi.
org/10.1177/0332489320933059

McCabe, Helen. (2021) “John Stuart Mill: market socialist?”, Review of Social Economy, 79(3), pp. 506-527. https://doi.org/10.1080/00346764.2020.1781923

Mill, John S. (1829 [1963]) “Letter 27 - To Gustave d’Eichthal”, in Francis E. Mineka (ed.) The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, Vol. XII - The Earlier Letters of John Stuart Mill 1812-1848, Part I. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, Routledge and Kegan Paul, pp. 34-38.
— (1833 [1981]) “A few observations on Mr. Mill”, in John M. Robson and Jack Stillinger (eds.) The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, Vol. I – Autobiography and Literary Essays. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, Routledge and Kegan Paul, pp. 589-595.
— (1834 [1967]) “Miss Martineau’s Summary of Political Economy”, in John M. Robson (ed.) The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, vol. IV - Essays on Economics and Society Part I. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, Routledge and Kegan Paul, pp. 223-228.
— (1843 [1974]) “A System of Logic Ratiocinative and Inductive”, in John M. Robson (ed.) The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, Vols. VII-VIII. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, Routledge, and Kegan Paul.

Mill, John S. (1844 [1967]) “Essays on some unsettled questions of political economy”, in John M. Robson (ed.) The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, Vol. IV – Essays on Economics and Society, Part I. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, Routledge and Kegan Paul, pp. 229-404.
— (1848 [1965]) “Principles of Political Economy. Books I-II”, in John M. Robson (ed.) The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, Vol. II. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, Routledge, and Kegan Paul.
— (1852 [1972]) “Letter 75 - To Karl. D. Heinrich Rau” in Francis E. Mineka and Dwight N. Lindley (eds.) The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, Vol. XIV –The Later Letters of John Stuart Mill 1849-1873, Part I. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, Routledge and Kegan Paul, pp. 86-87.
— (1859 [1977]) “On Liberty”, in John M. Robson (ed.) The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, Vol. XVIII – Essays on Politics and Society, Part I. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, Routledge and Kegan Paul, pp. 213-310.
— (1861 [1969]) “Utilitarianism”, in John M. Robson (ed.) The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, Vol. X – Essays on Ethics, Religion, and Society. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, Routledge and Kegan Paul, pp. 203-259.
— (1865 [1969]) “Auguste Comte and Positivism”, in John M. Robson (ed.) The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, Vol. X – Essays on Ethics, Religion, and Society. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, Routledge and Kegan Paul, pp. 261-368.
— (1870 [1967]) “Leslie on the Land Question”, in John M. Robson (ed.) The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, Vol. IV – Essays on Economics and Society, Part I. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, Routledge and Kegan Paul, pp. 669-685.
— (1873 [1981]) “Autobiography”, in John M. Robson and Jack Stillinger (eds.) The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, Vol. I – Autobiography and Literary Essays. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, Routledge and Kegan Paul, pp.-290.
— (1874 [1967]) “Essay on nature”, in John M. Robson (ed.) The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, Vol. IV – Essays on Economics and Society, Part I. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, Routledge and Kegan Paul, pp. 373-402.

Milonakis, Dimitris and Fine, Ben. (2009) From Political Economy to Economics: Method, the social and the historical in the evolution of economic theory. London: Routledge.

Mirowski, Philip. (1984) “Physics and the ‘marginalist revolution’”, Cambridge journal of Economics, 8(4), pp. 361-379. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.cje.a035556

Moore, Gregory. (2003) “John Neville Keynes’s Solution to the English Methodenstreit”, Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 25(1), pp.-38. https://doi.org/10.1080/1042771032000058307

Morgan, Mary S. (2006) “Economic man as model man: Ideal types, idealization and caricatures”, Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 28(1), pp.-27. https://doi.org/10.1080/10427710500509763

Oakley, Allen. (1993) “Human agency and methodology in classical political economy”, History of Economics Review, 20(1), pp. 13-40. https://doi.org/10.1080/10370196.1993.11733131
— (1994) Classical economic man: human agency and methodology in the political economy of Adam Smith and JS Mill. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

O’Connor, Martin. (1997) “John Stuart Mill’s utilitarianism and the social ethics of sustainable development”, 

Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 4(3), pp. 478-506. https://doi.org/10.1080/10427719700000063

Peart, Sandra J. (1995) “’Disturbing Causes’, ‘Noxious Errors’, and the Theory-Practice Distinction in the Economics of J.S. Mill and W. S. Jevons”, Canadian Journal of Economics, 28(4b), pp. 1194-1211. https:// doi.org/10.2307/136143

Persky, Joseph. (1995) “Retrospectives: The ethology of homo economicus”, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(2), pp. 221-231. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.9.2.221

Popper, Karl. (1945 [2011]). The open society and its enemies. London: Routledge.

Rosen, Frederick. (2007) “The Method of Reform: J. S. Mill’s Encounter with Bentham and Coleridge”, in Nadia Urbinati and Alex Zakaras (eds.) J. S. Mill’s Political Thought: A Bicentennial Reassessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 124-144.

Schabas, Margaret. (1990) A World Ruled by Number. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
— (2005) The Natural Origins of Economics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
— (2017) “More Food for Thought: Mill, Coleridge and the Dismal Science of Economics”, in Jed Buchwald and Larry Stewart (eds.) The Romance of Science: Essays in Honour of Trevor H. Levere. New York: Springer, pp. 151-162.

Schumpeter, Joseph A. (1954 [2006]) History of Economic Analysis. London: Routledge.

Scott, Sonya. (2018) “Mathematics is the lantern: Vito Volterra, Leon Walras, and Irving Fisher on the mathematization of economics”, Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 40(4), pp. 513-537. https:// doi.org/10.1017/S1053837217000670

Smits, Katherine. (2004) “John Stuart Mill and the social construction of identity”, History of Political Thought, 25(2), pp. 298-324. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/26220165

Sotiropoulos, Dimitris. (2009) “Why John Stuart Mill should not be enlisted among neoclassical economists”, The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 16(3), pp. 455-473. https://doi. org/10.1080/09672560903101328

Trincado, Estrella. (2008) “La actualidad de la economía de John Stuart Mill: una encrucijada entre clásicos y neoclásicos”, in Josefa D. Ruíz (ed.) John Stuart Mill y la democracia del siglo XXI. Madrid: Dykinson, pp. 247-294.

Van’t Klooster, Jens. (2022) “Marginalism and scope in the early Methodenstreit”, Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 44(1), pp. 105-124. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1053837220000413

Viskovatoff, Alex. (2003) “Rationalism and mainstream economics”, Journal of Economic Methodology, 10(3), pp. 397-415. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350178032000110918

Wade Hands, D. (2001). Reflection without Rules. Economic Methodology and contemporary science theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Zouboulakis, Michel S. (1997) “Mill and Jevons: Two concepts of economic rationality”, History of Economic Ideas, 5(2), pp.-25. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/23722404
— (2002) “John Stuart Mill’s institutional individualism”, History of Economic Ideas, 10(3), pp. 29-45. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/23722724
— (2001) “From Mill to Weber: the meaning of the concept of economic rationality”, European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 8(1), pp. 30-41. https://doi.org/10.1080/09672560010015431
— (2015) “Customary rule-following behaviour in the work of John Stuart Mill and Alfred Marshall”, Journal of Institutional Economics, 11(4), pp. 783-801. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744137414000502