References


Barbera`, S. (2011) “Strategy-proof social choice”, in by K.J. Arrow, A.K. Sen, K. Suzumura (eds) “Handbook of Social Choice and Welfare. Volume 2”. Elsevier. North– Holland, Amsterdam.

Barbera`, S., Dutta, B., Sen, A. (2001) Strategy–proof social choice correspondences. Journal of Economic Theory 101: 374–394.

Benoˆıt, J.P., (2002) Strategic manipulation in voting games when lotteries and ties are permitted. Journal of Economic Theory 102: 421–436.

Can, B., Erdamar, B., Sanver, R. (2009) Expected utility consistent extension of preferences. Theory and Decision 67: 123—144.

Dutta, B., Peters, H., Sen, A. (2007) Strategy–proof cardinal decision schemes. Social Choice and Welfare 28: 163–179.

Dutta, B., Peters, H., Sen, A. (2008) Strategy–proof cardinal decision schemes: Erratum. Social Choice and Welfare 30: 701–702.

Feldman, A. (1980) Strongly non manipulable multi–valued collective choice rules. Public Choice 35: 503–509.

Gibbard, A. (1973) Manipulation of voting schemes: A general result. Econometrica 41: 587–601.

Gibbard, A. (1977) Manipulation of voting schemes that mix voting with chance. Econometrica 45: 665-681.

Hylland, A. (1980) Strategy—proofness of voting procedures with lotteries as outcomes and infinite sets of strategies. University of Oslo. Institute of Economics.

Moulin, H. (1980) On strategy-proofness and single-peakedness. Public Choice 35: 437– 455.

Nandeibam, S. (2013) The structure of decision schemes with cardinal preferences. Review of Economic Design 17, 205–238.

Ozyurt, S., Sanver, R. (2008) A general impossibility result on strategy-proof social choice¨ hyperfunctions. Games and Economic Behavior 66: 880–892.

Rodr´ıguez-Alvarez, C. (2007) On the manipulation of social choice correspondences.´	Social Choice and Welfare 29: 175–199.

Rodr´ıguez-Alvarez, C. (2017) On single-peakedness and strategy-proofness: Ties between´ adjacent alternatives. Economics Bulletin 37, 1966–1974.

Rodr´ıguez-Alvarez, C. (2025) Strategy-Proof Social Choice Correspondences and Single-´ peaked Preferences. ICAE Working Paper 2506. Forthcoming Review of Economic Design.

Satterthwaite, M.A. (1975) Strategy-proofness and Arrow’s conditions: Existence and correspondence theorems for voting procedure and social welfare functions. Journal of Economic Theory 10:187-217